When you think of meditation, your first thought might be of uber-spiritual people sitting for hours in silence. It’s amazing for reducing stress, relaxing the muscles, and increasing respiratory capacity. By slowing down the breath, the body moves out of fight or flight and into a state of rest and digest. However, because of this preconceived idea, many people think that meditation is unattainable.
In truth, anyone can learn to meditate.
What is meditation?
Meditation, by definition, is simply focusing the mind on one thing and sustaining that focus for a period of time. That’s it. Focus and Sustain.
Contrary to popular belief, it is not (necessarily) clearing the mind of all thought. Although with a dedicated practice, one might reach that meditative experience, known as samadhi (or bliss state), where the mind is pure, clear, and unbound; where there are no thoughts or meditative objectives.
But in this fast-paced world, it’s less important to reach the state of samadhi and more important to actively calm the chatter of the mind. And you can do that by cultivating a simple, daily meditation practice.
Allow yourself the time and space necessary to explore your personal practice – everyone is different. Discover what meditation means to you.
Meditation and the Mind
The mind is used to being in charge but, over time, meditation will help to quiet the mind and turn down the volume on that pesky voice inside your head. There will be times when the mind wins. Don’t fret, it happens. Some days are better than others. That’s why they call it a practice.
Benefits of Meditation
Reduce stress, increase happiness
Activate the parasympathetic nervous system
Increase respiratory function and capacity
Improve your attention and awareness
Improve Memory
See the world/yourself more clearly
Tap into your personal navigation system (intuition)
Bring harmony and balance into your life
Five Minute Meditation
This is a great place to begin. Starting your day with a mindful practice will help you to ground and center, and prepare you for the day.
At first, the mind may chatter endlessly. That’s okay. Eventually, it will tire itself out and slow down. The more often you commit to a practice, the easier it will get.
Five minutes may feel like forever. It will get easier. As you become accustomed to the five minutes, you’ll be able to extend your time to six, seven or even ten minutes.
Remember: Meditation is simply focusing and sustaining the focus.
Step by Step Meditation – A Beginners Guide
There are no hard and fast rules when it comes to this practice. Explore and find out what works best for you!
Step 1
Get comfy. Support the body in any way it needs. Lay down, sit up, whatever position promotes relaxation.
Step 2
Set the alarm for 5 minutes. Commit to this length of time, even if the mind rambles for the entire session.
Step 3
Focus. Picture yourself staring up at a bright, blue sky. With each thought that creeps into your mind, see it like a cloud passing overhead. Just watch it as it crosses across your vision. Try not to interact with them. Notice them and let them move on.
Step 4
Sustain. As the mind wanders (which it usually does) gently guide your attention back to the sky. Your list of to-dos will be there when you’re finished. These 5 minutes are just for YOU!
These days, you feel like your brain is in a constant memory-zapping fog, and you can’t shake it. If you’re feeling this way now, what do the next ten years look like?
Research shows that memory lapses may happen at all ages, although they become an increasing concern for people as they age. Still, while some people are more prone to memory loss than others are, there are ways to prevent it from happening.
Here’s a rundown on how to prevent memory loss. Let’s jump in!
Eat a Healthy Diet
Adopting a balanced diet is one of the best steps for preventing memory loss. That’s because healthy eating will reduce your chances of developing diabetes, which has ties with Alzheimer’s disease.
To eat healthy foods, choose fruits, olive oil, nuts, and legumes, including beans and lentils. Consider also consuming eggs, fish, and vegetables. Limit sugar, alcohol, red meat, and processed food if you’re serious about leading a healthy lifestyle.
Some supplements are great for brain health that can work alongside your healthy diet. One of the essential supplements for the brain is magnesium. However, you need a specific type of magnesium to cross the blood-brain barrier. We recommend OptiMag® Neuro supplement from Xyomgen. If you want to learn more, click here- <a href=”http://www.wholescripts.com/register/dodychiro-dody” target=”_blank”>Nutritional Supplements</a>.
If you pay little attention to what you’re eating daily, consider keeping your own food diary. This will help you to keep better track of what you’re consuming. Then, you can make adjustments to your diet to reach your health goals.
Remain Social
You can also prevent memory and thinking problems simply by staying social. That’s because positive interactions with other people stimulate your brain, thus keeping it sharp. Additionally, social engagement protects against depression and anxiety, which can stifle your brain’s function.
To maintain a healthy social network, take time to join groups and talk with other people. Stay involved in religious activities, organizations, and clubs.
Perhaps you’re the type of person who prefers to stay home. If so, make sure you still have a couple of family members or friends- or even a pet- with whom you can still have fun.
Give Your Brain a Challenge
Yet another way to prevent memory loss is to keep the brain challenged.
A wide range of activities can help to boost your cognitive functions, including your memory. These include, for example, learning brand-new skills, playing instruments, doing puzzles, reading, volunteering, and working. You can also play games like Scrabble, Sudoku, and crossword puzzles to challenge your mind.
Another way to enhance your memory is through neurofeedback theory, a treatment used to address the irregular function of the brain. Through this technique, which is non-invasive, your brain is re-wired through training.
The neurofeedback technique can enhance your brain’s performance and function without the need for drugs, which can have unwanted side effects.
Stay Active
You can also keep memory loss at bay simply by exercising. That’s because exercise may prevent health issues known to cause memory loss, including the following:
Stroke
Obesity
High cholesterol
High blood pressure
Diabetes
Exercise may also cause brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a protein, to be released. This protein promotes the health of your brain’s nerve cells, which may boost your memory.
To start, try to walk for half an hour each day, five days per week. You can track your progress using the United States Agriculture Department SuperTracker site for weight management.
Get Plenty of Rest
Getting adequate sleep is also paramount for preventing memory loss. This is because concentration and attention decrease when a person suffers from restless sleep. In addition, the mental function of people who don’t get restful, normal sleep tends to be duller.
When you’re sleeping, the brain is refreshed and cleansed. This is why getting seven to nine hours of rest each night is crucial for healthy living.
To improve the quality of sleep you get each night, you should avoid drinking alcohol or caffeine near bedtime. In addition, be consistent when it comes to hitting the sack and rising the next morning.
Also, don’t eat large meals before going to bed. That’s because food is essentially fuel, so when you eat before bed, you’re giving your body more energy when you’re supposed to be winding down.
Minimize Stress
Although avoiding stress in everyday life may seem impossible, minimizing your stress levels can help you to avoid memory loss issues.
When your brain is under stress, a stress hormone called cortisol is produced at a high level. This makes it more difficult for you to extract information from the brain’s memory.
Consider doing meditation, massages, or yoga to keep your stress levels low.
Visit Your Doctor
Finally, remember that some medical conditions might cause you to lose your memory. These include vitamin deficiency and thyroid disease. This is why you should visit your local doctor. Your physician can help you to address these health problems properly.
Also, note that some medicines, like anxiety and sleep drugs, may affect your memory. Your doctor can review your existing medication with you to determine if any of them are the culprit in your memory loss.
How We Can Help You to Master How to Prevent Memory Loss
If you’re wondering how to prevent memory loss, consider taking steps to minimize stress in your life and improve your sleep quality. You may also want to stay active and adopt a more nutritious diet daily.
Fortunately, at Dody Chiropractic, we take pride in helping health-conscious individuals to improve their health and wellness through chiropractic care and functional nutrition. We also provide neurofeedback services for individuals seeking help with depression, anxiety, ADHD, and memory issues.
Get in touch with us to learn more about our services and how we can enhance your mind’s health today!
What if I told you that the current vaccines for Covid-19 have likely killed over 25,000 Americans, would that number shock you? If it does, you need to read more about what you do not hear in the mainstream media.
I read a great article from an entrepreneur named Steve Kirsch. Steve has made millions in different business endeavors. When the threat of a Covid-19 pandemic was ramping up, he used his intellect to look for early treatment options, called fluvoxamine, for fighting this virus. He was so passionate about helping find a treatment he used his own money for research and development. If you want to see more about the evidence, check out this webpage-Fluvoxamine evidence.
Here are his observations from his research on this vaccine-
We are not getting accurate numbers of deaths and injuries related to these vaccines.
The spike protein is toxic and is accumulating in many tissues outside of the injection site.
Fertility and miscarriages are among the adverse events from taking the vaccine.
Myocarditis is a major adverse event in teen boys after taking the vaccine.
The risk-to-benefit ratio for kids taking the vaccine is none. No benefit, only risk.
These vaccines are 500x more deadly than the flu vaccine.
These vaccines have generated more adverse reports in the last six months than all 70 vaccines over the past 30 years.
There are more conclusions that he has made but let’s dive deeper into the ones above.
Inaccurate Deaths and Adverse Events Reported
Most people don’t realize that the system we use in the United States to report vaccine injuries is voluntary. This system is called VAERS. As a voluntary system, we have no idea whether all of the events are being documented or not. This unknown means that the CDC has no idea what the actual numbers are for deaths or injuries relating to the vaccine.
Our government wanted to know how accurate the numbers in this system were. A review funded by the HHS conducted by Harvard Medical School found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” to VAERS over three years. This underreporting could equal 100 times more adverse events than are reported.
We also know that VAERS is a lagging indicator of the number of adverse events. There is always a backlog of the reports submitted but not entered into the system. According to OpenVAERS, there have been 5,993 deaths related to the vaccines at the time of writing this article.
What if this were only 1% of the actual reported deaths? That number would be staggering.
Spike Protein Accumulating in Tissues
Growing research and clinical data have shown that the spike protein that the mRNA sequence is coding for in the cell may be toxic. Initially, developers of the vaccines thought that the spike protein did not affect the tissues in the body. However, we now know that this is not the case.
We have seen with the mass vaccination of the population that the spike protein can cause damage to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys.
Dr. Byron Bridle, Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph, stated, “We made a big mistake” after reviewing this report. He went on to say, “We did not realize it until now, we thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, but we never knew the spike protein itself was a potential toxin. By vaccinating people, we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin”. Here is an interview of Dr. Bridle where he is discussing his concerns.
The concentration in the ovaries is particularly concerning because we are vaccinating younger women who are in their reproductive prime. These women had minimal risk of dying from the virus but may damage their reproductive system because of this vaccine.
Fertility and Miscarriages
As we just discussed, there is an increase in the lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries. We know that the endometrial lining of a woman’s uterus is very fragile.
Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a world-renowned pathologist, talks about his experience with this on the Highwire. He also talked about blood clots caused by the spike protein attacking the ACE-2 receptors in the blood vessels. He states we don’t know how this will affect young women in the future. However, the decrease in the blood supply from blood clots to the endometrium could lead to miscarriages and issues with infertility.
Another issue raised by Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, is that the Syncytin-1 tissue in the placenta is similar to the spike proteins in the SARS virus. Simply put, the similarity means that the body of a vaccinated woman would attack her placental tissue and prevent its formation. If you would like to hear more from Dr. Yeadon, check out his interview with Del Bigtree.
Myocarditis in Vaccinated Kids
Israel has a much more robust tracking system for adverse events from vaccines than the US. Israel is also one of the countries that vaccinated a large portion of the population very rapidly.
Researchers in Israel reported, “between one in 3,000 and one in 6,000 men between the ages of 16 and 24 had developed myocarditis, or heart muscle inflammation, after receiving both doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine there.” These findings are 25 times the standard background rate of myocarditis for that age range.
According to the article, this report was the first extensive study linking cases of heart inflammation to Covid-19 vaccinations. However, Israel is not the only country to see these issues.
According to the state of Connecticut, “As of May 24th, working with several Connecticut hospitals, DPH has identified 18 people out of nearly 400,000 fully vaccinated 16-34 year-olds who have developed myocarditis after recently receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.”
Beyond what we have already discussed with myocarditis, a study showed that kids have innate immunity to Covid-19. In addition, the researchers state, “Kids are armed with anti-coronavirus B cells.”
According to the CDC, deaths in children under 17 years of age was 0.04% of all Covid-19 deaths in the US. So my question is, if the risk of death is almost zero, why would we put our children at risk of severe adverse effects or even death from vaccinations. Take a look at the many adverse events in younger children in OpenVAERS.
More Serious Side Effects
As discussed, these vaccines have had more adverse events than all previous vaccines combined over the last 30 years. Of course, fact-checkers will say this is mostly false. However, as you can see from the VAERS data, we have had almost 6,000 deaths report directly related to the Covid-19 vaccines. Remember, these deaths are from a vaccine that is under emergency use authorization.
Do you think we may have sped up the safety studies and looked the other way to any concerns?
Are there other medications that have much longer safety records that could treat or even prevent Covid-19?
I hope this article and its links help you find out more about what you do not hear in mainstream media. Please share this vital information with friends and family members.
What if I told you that the current vaccines for Covid-19 have likely killed over 25,000 Americans, would that number shock you? If it does, you need to read more about what you do not hear in the mainstream media.
I read a great article from an entrepreneur named Steve Kirsch. Steve has made millions in different business endeavors. When the threat of a Covid-19 pandemic was ramping up, he used his intellect to look for early treatment options, called fluvoxamine, for fighting this virus. He was so passionate about helping find a treatment he used his own money for research and development. If you want to see more about the evidence, check out this webpage-Fluvoxamine evidence.
Here are his observations from his research on this vaccine-
We are not getting accurate numbers of deaths and injuries related to these vaccines.
The spike protein is toxic and is accumulating in many tissues outside of the injection site.
Fertility and miscarriages are among the adverse events from taking the vaccine.
Myocarditis is a major adverse event in teen boys after taking the vaccine.
The risk-to-benefit ratio for kids taking the vaccine is none. No benefit, only risk.
These vaccines are 500x more deadly than the flu vaccine.
These vaccines have generated more adverse reports in the last six months than all 70 vaccines over the past 30 years.
There are more conclusions that he has made but let’s dive deeper into the ones above.
Inaccurate Deaths and Adverse Events Reported
Most people don’t realize that the system we use in the United States to report vaccine injuries is voluntary. This system is called VAERS. As a voluntary system, we have no idea whether all of the events are being documented or not. This unknown means that the CDC has no idea what the actual numbers are for deaths or injuries relating to the vaccine.
Our government wanted to know how accurate the numbers in this system were. A review funded by the HHS conducted by Harvard Medical School found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” to VAERS over three years. This underreporting could equal 100 times more adverse events than are reported.
We also know that VAERS is a lagging indicator of the number of adverse events. There is always a backlog of the reports submitted but not entered into the system. According to OpenVAERS, there have been 5,993 deaths related to the vaccines at the time of writing this article.
What if this were only 1% of the actual reported deaths? That number would be staggering.
Spike Protein Accumulating in Tissues
Growing research and clinical data have shown that the spike protein that the mRNA sequence is coding for in the cell may be toxic. Initially, developers of the vaccines thought that the spike protein did not affect the tissues in the body. However, we now know that this is not the case.
We have seen with the mass vaccination of the population that the spike protein can cause damage to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys.
Dr. Byron Bridle, Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph, stated, “We made a big mistake” after reviewing this report. He went on to say, “We did not realize it until now, we thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, but we never knew the spike protein itself was a potential toxin. By vaccinating people, we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin”. Here is an interview of Dr. Bridle where he is discussing his concerns.
The concentration in the ovaries is particularly concerning because we are vaccinating younger women who are in their reproductive prime. These women had minimal risk of dying from the virus but may damage their reproductive system because of this vaccine.
Fertility and Miscarriages
As we just discussed, there is an increase in the lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries. We know that the endometrial lining of a woman’s uterus is very fragile.
Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a world-renowned pathologist, talks about his experience with this on the Highwire. He also talked about blood clots caused by the spike protein attacking the ACE-2 receptors in the blood vessels. He states we don’t know how this will affect young women in the future. However, the decrease in the blood supply from blood clots to the endometrium could lead to miscarriages and issues with infertility.
Another issue raised by Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, is that the Syncytin-1 tissue in the placenta is similar to the spike proteins in the SARS virus. Simply put, the similarity means that the body of a vaccinated woman would attack her placental tissue and prevent its formation. If you would like to hear more from Dr. Yeadon, check out his interview with Del Bigtree.
Myocarditis in Vaccinated Kids
Israel has a much more robust tracking system for adverse events from vaccines than the US. Israel is also one of the countries that vaccinated a large portion of the population very rapidly.
Researchers in Israel reported, “between one in 3,000 and one in 6,000 men between the ages of 16 and 24 had developed myocarditis, or heart muscle inflammation, after receiving both doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine there.” These findings are 25 times the standard background rate of myocarditis for that age range.
According to the article, this report was the first extensive study linking cases of heart inflammation to Covid-19 vaccinations. However, Israel is not the only country to see these issues.
According to the state of Connecticut, “As of May 24th, working with several Connecticut hospitals, DPH has identified 18 people out of nearly 400,000 fully vaccinated 16-34 year-olds who have developed myocarditis after recently receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.”
Beyond what we have already discussed with myocarditis, a study showed that kids have innate immunity to Covid-19. In addition, the researchers state, “Kids are armed with anti-coronavirus B cells.”
According to the CDC, deaths in children under 17 years of age was 0.04% of all Covid-19 deaths in the US. So my question is, if the risk of death is almost zero, why would we put our children at risk of severe adverse effects or even death from vaccinations. Take a look at the many adverse events in younger children in OpenVAERS.
More Serious Side Effects
As discussed, these vaccines have had more adverse events than all previous vaccines combined over the last 30 years. Of course, fact-checkers will say this is mostly false. However, as you can see from the VAERS data, we have had almost 6,000 deaths report directly related to the Covid-19 vaccines. Remember, these deaths are from a vaccine that is under emergency use authorization.
Do you think we may have sped up the safety studies and looked the other way to any concerns?
Are there other medications that have much longer safety records that could treat or even prevent Covid-19?
I hope this article and its links help you find out more about what you do not hear in mainstream media. Please share this vital information with friends and family members.
When we look at the safety and effectiveness of any vaccine, studies report the numbers in many different ways. Several years ago, I did a video on the flu vaccine (see video here) and how the studies reported its effectiveness.
If you watched that video, you saw how they used statistical mathematics to make the flu shot seem more effective.
These math calculations are the same thing we see with the Covid-19 vaccination. Let me explain more.
Many experts believe that to bring this COVID-19 pandemic to an end, a large portion of the world needs to be immune to the virus by receiving the required protection through vaccination. In the past couple of months, several research teams wrote studies to challenge how well the vaccines offer protection. As these vaccines trick the body into making the spike protein that causes the disease, the possible side effects may include fever, headache, fatigue, pain, diarrhea, weakness, and swelling or itchiness at the injection area.
Clinical trials and expert researchers are trying to learn more about these vaccines to keep the public informed as new evidence becomes available. So in this article, we will discuss how relative risk and absolute risk vary in showing the safety and effectiveness of a vaccine to help you make well-informed decisions.
Efficacy and Effectiveness
Efficacy refers to the relative risk reduction or RRR. In other words, how well does any treatment do its job. It is a ratio that compares the risk of someone in the control group relative to someone in the treatment group. The efficacy and effectiveness of each vaccine are measured by the rates of disease between the vaccinated people compared to those who are not vaccinated.
Controlled clinical testings and trials measure the vaccine’s efficacy. In contrast, the vaccine’s effectiveness can only be determined once these vaccines are FDA-approved and are given to the general public. Or in the case of the Covid-19 vaccine given emergency authorization use by the FDA.
The duration of immunity provided by these clinically tested vaccines varies by individual and the type of vaccine, but generally, lifelong immunity may not be possible. Therefore, one should consider the time or period when vulnerability to the disease is most prevalent. Your risk of contracting any disease is directly related to your immune system function. Knowing how to keep your immune system high is essential.
What were the outcomes of the clinical trials?
The clinical trial evidence suggests that fully vaccinated individuals are less likely to get sick or severely ill with COVID-19. Severe sickness is the outcome they studied in the vaccine trials.
However, it is also important to note that some people who received all recommended doses of a COVID-19 vaccine may still get sick because no vaccine is 100% effective to all individuals. They did not look at this outcome in the trials.
If you were to ask most people if the vaccine prevented you from contracting the disease, most people would say yes. Sadly, most people believe this vaccine prevents you from contracting Covid-19. This belief is not true.
Thus, according to the World Health Organization, one should assess COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational study designs for an unbiased evaluation and laboratory-confirmed result.
Do you think our health experts will do an unbiased evaluation?
Explaining RRR
According to a study published by The Lancet, vaccine efficacy is reported as a relative risk reduction. RRR tells us how much a specific treatment reduces the risk of bad outcomes as a proportion to the rate of the control group who did not have the treatment.
Here is an example from an article on NCBI’s website of RRR- “The relative risk reduction of fever and rash in the group of the children on the intervention was 40 percent (1 – 0.6 = 0.4 or 40 percent).” In this example, the relative risk was 0.4, subtracted from 1, giving you the 40% relative risk reduction.
It is important to note that no treatment can be expected to produce the same outcome for every individual. This is due to several factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, or an existing chronic illness. Therefore, these relative risk reduction statistics are implemented to allow medical practitioners to understand the likelihood that the treatment will produce an unfavorable outcome. RRR can help explain to patients what effects can be expected.
Explaining ARR
Another useful tool to calculate the effectiveness of a vaccine and prevent the virus’s further spread is absolute risk reduction (ARR). It is referred to as the difference between the event rates in the two groups–the control group and the treatment group. The result tells medical experts how much risk of an adverse effect could happen. ARR helps them alleviate this from happening. While RRR helps determine the total number of participants who could benefit from the vaccine, ARR helps them see the difference between attack rates in the groups with and without the vaccine.
A comparison of the numbers among the two is needed to derive the overall effectiveness and absolute reductions of a vaccine to allow medical professionals to figure out exactly how many lives the vaccine will save. Furthermore, when choosing which type of vaccine to take, it is crucial to use the RRRs and the ARRs to compare the science-backed evidence and have a complete picture of the actual data.
Efficacy Data From The Clinical Trails
The vaccination datasets published by governments and health ministries worldwide were reported to have a relative risk reduction of 95% for Pfizer-BioNtech, 94% for the Moderna-NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the AstraZeneca-Oxford, and 67% for the Johnson and Johnson vaccines. Lancet Microbe has also pointed out that the absolute risk reductions in Pfizer, J&J, and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are as follows: 0.84% for Pfizer, 1.2% for J&J, and 1.2% for Moderna.
We know all medical treatments that use medications or vaccines have side effects. Taking a new vaccine with limited safety studies has inherent risks. You have to consider your overall health, age, and risk of contracting a severe cause of Covid-19 with the unknown potential long-term risks. We will dive into the safety of this shot later. The overall effectiveness for an individual from the trials, which the ARR represents, is about 1% with these vaccines.
However, using the currently available data may not be enough to answer all our general questions because of the difficulty in different study protocols, including study populations, primary end-points, types of placebo, duration of exposure, background risks of COVID-19 during the study, statistical methods for efficacy, and many more.
Safety of the Vaccines
A large portion of our population is still hesitant to be vaccinated because of the misguided information about vaccines. On the other hand, research data from large clinical trials from the FDA has shown that vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were deemed to have good safety records. Remember, these clinical trials had a limited time to study any adverse outcomes.
However, after these vaccines were distributed to the general public, we can see some alarming numbers that have not been reported in the media.
The Covid-19 adverse effects data is easy to find on the Open Vaers website. As of May 14th, there have been 4,201 deaths associated with the Covid-19 vaccines. You can also research this yourself by going to Vaers website directly. Open Vaers takes the data from the Vaers website and simplifies it.
Known Adverse Events
The federal agencies received reports about a small number of women in the U.S. who developed a severe and rare type of blood clot a few weeks after getting the J&J vaccine. Although the number of reported severe problems in controlled clinical trials was relatively low, it is still crucial to know the difference between those who received the actual vaccine and those who received a placebo.
Furthermore, a statement from the CDC suggests that people suffering from severe allergies to certain foods, insects, latex, or other common allergens should take caution and discuss the vaccination with a medical expert who can evaluate and assess their risks before deciding to get vaccinated.
Pfizer’s press release about pregnant women
Pfizer also put out a statement the pregnant women should avoid exposure to the vaccine during pregnancy. They also stated in their press release that exposure could be the following-
“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention (vaccine) by inhalation or skin contact.”
“A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention (vaccine) by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
If a pregnant woman has exposure to the vaccine (study intervention), the risks to watch are as follows-
ectopic pregnancy,
spontaneous abortion,
intrauterine fetal demise,
neonatal death,
or congenital anomaly.
Conclusion-
It is also important to stay vigilant with the information found online. Make sure to verify the new information with reliable sources to help navigate these ever-changing times.
It would be best if you made an educated risk vs. benefits analysis for taking these vaccines. Only you know what choice is best for you.
When we look at the safety and effectiveness of any vaccine, studies report the numbers in many different ways. Several years ago, I did a video on the flu vaccine (see video here) and how the studies reported its effectiveness.
If you watched that video, you saw how they used statistical mathematics to make the flu shot seem more effective.
These math calculations are the same thing we see with the Covid-19 vaccination. Let me explain more.
Many experts believe that to bring this COVID-19 pandemic to an end, a large portion of the world needs to be immune to the virus by receiving the required protection through vaccination. In the past couple of months, several research teams wrote studies to challenge how well the vaccines offer protection. As these vaccines trick the body into making the spike protein that causes the disease, the possible side effects may include fever, headache, fatigue, pain, diarrhea, weakness, and swelling or itchiness at the injection area.
Clinical trials and expert researchers are trying to learn more about these vaccines to keep the public informed as new evidence becomes available. So in this article, we will discuss how relative risk and absolute risk vary in showing the safety and effectiveness of a vaccine to help you make well-informed decisions.
Efficacy and Effectiveness
Efficacy refers to the relative risk reduction or RRR. In other words, how well does any treatment do its job. It is a ratio that compares the risk of someone in the control group relative to someone in the treatment group. The efficacy and effectiveness of each vaccine are measured by the rates of disease between the vaccinated people compared to those who are not vaccinated.
Controlled clinical testings and trials measure the vaccine’s efficacy. In contrast, the vaccine’s effectiveness can only be determined once these vaccines are FDA-approved and are given to the general public. Or in the case of the Covid-19 vaccine given emergency authorization use by the FDA.
The duration of immunity provided by these clinically tested vaccines varies by individual and the type of vaccine, but generally, lifelong immunity may not be possible. Therefore, one should consider the time or period when vulnerability to the disease is most prevalent. Your risk of contracting any disease is directly related to your immune system function. Knowing how to keep your immune system high is essential.
What were the outcomes of the clinical trials?
The clinical trial evidence suggests that fully vaccinated individuals are less likely to get sick or severely ill with COVID-19. Severe sickness is the outcome they studied in the vaccine trials.
However, it is also important to note that some people who received all recommended doses of a COVID-19 vaccine may still get sick because no vaccine is 100% effective to all individuals. They did not look at this outcome in the trials.
If you were to ask most people if the vaccine prevented you from contracting the disease, most people would say yes. Sadly, most people believe this vaccine prevents you from contracting Covid-19. This belief is not true.
Thus, according to the World Health Organization, one should assess COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational study designs for an unbiased evaluation and laboratory-confirmed result.
Do you think our health experts will do an unbiased evaluation?
Explaining RRR
According to a study published by The Lancet, vaccine efficacy is reported as a relative risk reduction. RRR tells us how much a specific treatment reduces the risk of bad outcomes as a proportion to the rate of the control group who did not have the treatment.
Here is an example from an article on NCBI’s website of RRR- “The relative risk reduction of fever and rash in the group of the children on the intervention was 40 percent (1 – 0.6 = 0.4 or 40 percent).” In this example, the relative risk was 0.4, subtracted from 1, giving you the 40% relative risk reduction.
It is important to note that no treatment can be expected to produce the same outcome for every individual. This is due to several factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, or an existing chronic illness. Therefore, these relative risk reduction statistics are implemented to allow medical practitioners to understand the likelihood that the treatment will produce an unfavorable outcome. RRR can help explain to patients what effects can be expected.
Explaining ARR
Another useful tool to calculate the effectiveness of a vaccine and prevent the virus’s further spread is absolute risk reduction (ARR). It is referred to as the difference between the event rates in the two groups–the control group and the treatment group. The result tells medical experts how much risk of an adverse effect could happen. ARR helps them alleviate this from happening. While RRR helps determine the total number of participants who could benefit from the vaccine, ARR helps them see the difference between attack rates in the groups with and without the vaccine.
A comparison of the numbers among the two is needed to derive the overall effectiveness and absolute reductions of a vaccine to allow medical professionals to figure out exactly how many lives the vaccine will save. Furthermore, when choosing which type of vaccine to take, it is crucial to use the RRRs and the ARRs to compare the science-backed evidence and have a complete picture of the actual data.
Efficacy Data From The Clinical Trails
The vaccination datasets published by governments and health ministries worldwide were reported to have a relative risk reduction of 95% for Pfizer-BioNtech, 94% for the Moderna-NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the AstraZeneca-Oxford, and 67% for the Johnson and Johnson vaccines. Lancet Microbe has also pointed out that the absolute risk reductions in Pfizer, J&J, and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are as follows: 0.84% for Pfizer, 1.2% for J&J, and 1.2% for Moderna.
We know all medical treatments that use medications or vaccines have side effects. Taking a new vaccine with limited safety studies has inherent risks. You have to consider your overall health, age, and risk of contracting a severe cause of Covid-19 with the unknown potential long-term risks. We will dive into the safety of this shot later. The overall effectiveness for an individual from the trials, which the ARR represents, is about 1% with these vaccines.
However, using the currently available data may not be enough to answer all our general questions because of the difficulty in different study protocols, including study populations, primary end-points, types of placebo, duration of exposure, background risks of COVID-19 during the study, statistical methods for efficacy, and many more.
Safety of the Vaccines
A large portion of our population is still hesitant to be vaccinated because of the misguided information about vaccines. On the other hand, research data from large clinical trials from the FDA has shown that vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were deemed to have good safety records. Remember, these clinical trials had a limited time to study any adverse outcomes.
However, after these vaccines were distributed to the general public, we can see some alarming numbers that have not been reported in the media.
The Covid-19 adverse effects data is easy to find on the Open Vaers website. As of May 14th, there have been 4,201 deaths associated with the Covid-19 vaccines. You can also research this yourself by going to Vaers website directly. Open Vaers takes the data from the Vaers website and simplifies it.
Known Adverse Events
The federal agencies received reports about a small number of women in the U.S. who developed a severe and rare type of blood clot a few weeks after getting the J&J vaccine. Although the number of reported severe problems in controlled clinical trials was relatively low, it is still crucial to know the difference between those who received the actual vaccine and those who received a placebo.
Furthermore, a statement from the CDC suggests that people suffering from severe allergies to certain foods, insects, latex, or other common allergens should take caution and discuss the vaccination with a medical expert who can evaluate and assess their risks before deciding to get vaccinated.
Pfizer’s press release about pregnant women
Pfizer also put out a statement the pregnant women should avoid exposure to the vaccine during pregnancy. They also stated in their press release that exposure could be the following-
“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention (vaccine) by inhalation or skin contact.”
“A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention (vaccine) by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
If a pregnant woman has exposure to the vaccine (study intervention), the risks to watch are as follows-
ectopic pregnancy,
spontaneous abortion,
intrauterine fetal demise,
neonatal death,
or congenital anomaly.
Conclusion-
It is also important to stay vigilant with the information found online. Make sure to verify the new information with reliable sources to help navigate these ever-changing times.
It would be best if you made an educated risk vs. benefits analysis for taking these vaccines. Only you know what choice is best for you.
What if I told you there is a way to help you reduce or even eliminate joint and muscle pain by performing an easy 10-minute stretching program. I got the opportunity to interview author Bart Potter about his book Jiffy Body. It was a great interview about how his stretching program aligns with what we do here at our clinic. If you want to reduce joint and muscle pain then this interview will point you in the right direction.
Who Is Bart Potter?
Bart Potter is the author of the book Jiffy Body. As a former athlete, he developed tremendous chronic body pain. He talks about his journey to figure out how to alleviate that chronic pain. As an Exercise Therapist, Bart has been helping people struggling with chronic pain with his Jiffy Body system since 1995. He purpose is to help people avoid joint and muscle pain.
How Does Jiffy Body Help You Avoid Joint and Muscle Pain?
This interview goes into some of the basics of the Jiffy Body system. We talk about why the Jiffy Body stretching system works. In the interview, we dive into restoring muscle balance and why that is so important. Other topics we discuss are how making sure you have the full range of motion in your joints is critical for injury prevention. Finally, we look at how strengthening muscle weakness can help you better handle your day-to-day physical stresses.
Bart discusses why blood flow to the tissues surrounding your joints is so important. Not only does it help the healing process, but it can also actually reduce the aches and pains that you are experiencing.
Jiffy Body and Chiropractic Care
As we discuss in the interview, both Bart’s system and chiropractic care work with posture. When we assess someone at our Littleton CO chiropractic clinic, we always look at posture and how it affects the nervous system function. The spinal posture directly relates to the spinal cord and how much pressure is being put on the spinal cord. As a chiropractor, I make sure each segment in your spine is moving properly, which in turn, helps the flow of energy through the nervous system. There is a lot of overlap in how Jiffy Body helps a person’s overall function and how chiropractic does the same thing.
What Can Jiffy Body Help With?
So if you are interested in:
Reducing, eliminating, or preventing pain, swelling, or stiffness
Improving overall posture
Increasing bone density
Regaining balance, strength, and flexibility
Restoring energy
Keeping those joints moving effectively
Enjoying your life as you get older
Then please listen to this interview with Bart Potter to get more information. The interview is at the beginning of this blog.
Sample of Jiffy Body
I know most people like to experience something before they jump in with both feet. Bart was gracious enough to provide a sample stretching routine for you to try. If you are interested in purchasing his book, go to his website JiffyBody.com. There is also some great free information on that website as well. I hope you enjoy the interview.
Parents have the right to decide to vaccinate their children or not. The issue is controversial. There are pros and cons shared for both sides of it. Parents tend to be encouraged to vaccinate as they are told vaccinating will reduce their child’s risk of getting certain ailments.
Are unvaccinated kids healthy? New research data indicates unvaccinated children are just as healthy as or healthier than those with vaccinations. According to the study, unvaccinated children had lower rates of many common childhood diseases such as asthma, allergies, ear infections, and ADHD.
The choice to vaccinate is a tough one. We always coach parents to get as much information as possible. Parents need to ask as many questions to their pediatrician as possible. This new research answers the question- Are vaccinated children healthier than non-vaccinated children? Parents always want to do the best for their children, but do the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risk?
Long-Term Research On Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Kids
This study focused on the number of times the patients were in the clinic for medical care beyond a routine checkup. What was unique about this study is that it looked at the total diagnoses with the variable of vaccination. The data sets that were found in this study were rigorously analyzed, and according to the authors, it was hard not to see differences between the two groups.
The study didn’t find unvaccinated children to require more visits to the doctor or to have a higher need for medical care than those that were vaccinated. Some data indicates children who are vaccinated tend to get sick more frequently. It also showed there are CDC safety concerns that are widely ignored when it comes to vaccinations.
Some of the types of health issues found to be higher with those vaccinated include:
ADHD and other behavioral concerns
Allergies
Anemia
Asthma and other related breathing concerns
Ear pain and infections
Respiratory infections
Skin disorders including eczema and dermatitis
Check out an interview with one of the study’s authors-
The CDC does put out warnings about vaccines, and they would like parents to be well-informed before they make any decision. However, the CDC or HHS has not and won’t conduct any research regarding the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. They feel it would be unethical to withhold vaccinations from children to complete the studies.
Other researchers argue there are enough children not being vaccinated due to parental choice to conduct such studies. There is a lot of data that major health insurers have on diagnoses and office visits comparing the two groups of children. Unfortunately, that information is not analyzed for those health outcomes.
Researchers rely on that information to help them conduct their studies and collect data. They have provided such data to Congress to get attention on the issue of vaccinations. This information would be invaluable to parents who want to make an informed choice to either delay or not vaccinate their children.
Part of the information they shared indicates vaccinated children have a higher risk of chronic ailments. While those ailments may not be life-threatening, they do require ongoing medical care. They often require the use of medication ongoing. The reports also share with the CDC and Congress children with a family history of autoimmune issues may struggle with their health if they are vaccinated.
Questions To Ask About Vaccines
Here are some questions that any parent can ask his or her doctor about vaccines-
Are vaccinated children healthier than non-vaccinated children?
Do the benefits outweigh the possible risks?
Are vaccines effective?
Are vaccine doses personalized to each child?
What’s in a vaccine?
How do vaccines cause damage?
Does good science support vaccination efficacy and safety?
Above is a short list of questions that every parent should have their medical doctor answer. It would be nice to get the actual research that supports the vaccinations. I would also recommend looking at the vaccine shot insert.
Conclusion Are Unvaccinated Kids Healthy
The decision to vaccinate or not is one many parents struggle with every day. They may feel pressure from their child’s doctor and society to have it done. It is essential to look at the facts and to evaluate the information.
More information allows parents to make a choice they feel is right for their household. It is reassuring to know the data doesn’t show unvaccinated children are unhealthy. In many instances, they are just as healthy as or healthier than vaccinated children.
Was the lockdown worth it? Now that we are six months into Covid-19, what does the data say about how we handled this pandemic? If you remember way back in April when Governor Polis issued the statewide “Stay at Home” mandate.
What was the goal of this mandate? It was to flatten the curve and not overwhelm the medical system with cases.
Experts said flattening the curve would not change the number of deaths in the United States. It would just slow the severe cases enough not to overwhelm hospitals. That means that the area under the curve is the same no matter what we did to lockdown.
In July, our Governor decided to issue a statewide mask mandate even though the CDC reported that in a meta-analysis, the evidence was minimal at best that masks prevent the spread of a virus.
The only way I could objectively look at the lockdown and masking mandates’ effectiveness is to compare a country that didn’t do strict lockdown or have any mask mandates at all. In this article and video, we are comparing the United States to Sweden.
Before we jump into the comparison, we need to look at a few ideas that have been a part of epidemiology for a long time. In the 1800s, there was a prominent epidemiologist named William Farr. He proved that epidemic infections follow a standard bell curve distribution. This means that infections will spike, and then after some lag time, deaths from that infection will spike at a lesser level. This idea is known as Farr’s law and is well established in the field of epidemiology.
Dr. Farr also stated that the only data that is a fact is deaths. All other data is just inference. This means that we can only guess how infectious the virus is and how it will affect an individual. Even in our modern times, we don’t test every individual every time we have an epidemic. It is hard to know how virulent a specific germ is when you don’t know how many people have caught the bug but did not show any symptoms.
Another doctor who spent years looking into epidemic influenza was R.E. Hope-Simpson. He wrote a paper talking about flu seasonality, like the current coronavirus. He hypothesized in his article, “The role of season in the epidemiology of influenza” that flu viruses affect more people during fall/winter and less during summer months.
Understanding Farr’s Law and the flu seasonality will help explain what we see when comparing the US to Sweden. In the graphs, you will see how it follows Farr’s Law and Hope-Simpson’s diagrams.
At the time of the interview I did with Dr. Scott Hourigan, the US had 621 deaths per 1 million people. That number is increasing weekly. Sweden, on the other hand, had 581 deaths per 1 million people. Sweden’s number has been relatively steady, only increasing by 1 or 2 every few weeks.
Here is what you need to know, the US did significant lockdowns and mask mandates, and some states are still observing those mandates. The US shut down schools, events, and a lot of businesses.
Sweden, on the other hand, recommended social distancing and voluntary reduction of the capacity of businesses. They only sent home the high school and college-aged students. All younger students stayed in school and are currently still attending school. They had no mask mandates, and most Swedes did not wear masks.
With the significant difference in approaches, you can see that the deaths are about the same. However, the US sees more deaths at this point than Sweden is when averaged to population size.
And if we look at this logically, the essential workers in the United States, such as grocery stores, hardware stores, and healthcare workers, did not see spikes in deaths. How can a grocery store worker who works indoors and is exposed to hundreds, if not thousands of people, when they work not see a spike in severe cases or deaths from this virus? It just doesn’t make sense.
We know the US and worldwide lockdowns had a significant impact on economies and mental health of the citizens subjected to the lockdowns. In the US, the CDC reported a 41% increase in mental health issues. There was a rise in suicides, domestic violence, and health problems related to addiction and other mental health issues.
As far as the economy goes, there is a great website called Clever Maps that shows how this pandemic affected the economy. According to the World Bank, the US had a 17.6% economic loss compared to Sweden’s 8.3% loss. The whole world’s economy was affected by this pandemic, but as you can see, Sweden to much less of a hit than the US who mandated lockdowns.
So was it worth doing the lockdowns in the US? Some will argue that it prevented a lot of deaths. But as we stated earlier, even the experts said lockdowns wouldn’t reduce the area under the curve, meaning deaths. It will only flatten the curve. There were and are a lot of economic and mental health issues directly related to the lockdown.
Sweden handled things differently and didn’t have as severe consequences when looking at their economy and mental health issues. Maybe allowing this virus to run its natural course would have been a better option in the US as well.
I guess only time will tell. This much we do know human-made solutions will never stop a virus from spreading. It will only lengthen the time of its spread and have other unintended consequences.
One of the most significant holes in vaccine research is that there are no studies on the health outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children. Well, a new study is out that looks directly at that issue.
Most people are aware of the “anti-vaccine” movement that has been gaining traction for some time. Regardless of where you stand on the issue, a new study by epidemiologist Brian Hooker, Ph.D., has cast some more light on the situation.
Read on to see how this new knowledge might change how you view vaccines for anyone curious about the different health outcomes of vaccinated children and unvaccinated children.
The Study Uses Medical Clinic Data
Hooker looked at three different data sets from three medical clinics across the United States. The final data set analyzed 2047 children under the age of 1, spanning a decade from 2005 to 2015. The authors of the study compared children who received vaccinations in their first year of life, to those who did not receive vaccinations.
The researchers followed each child from birth to the age of three to look for specific diagnoses. The study looked at four particular diagnoses: developmental delays, asthma, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders in the children.
Health Outcomes of Vaccinated Children vs. Unvaccinated Children
This study aimed to compare the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated pediatric populations. The research shows that vaccinated children are, ironically, suffering from more health issues than unvaccinated children.
Based on the information, it appears that problems such as developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections all occur at an increased rate in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children.
Even more importantly, these issues, when present, seem to have a more severe presence in those children who have received a higher amount of vaccines.
What Was The Increase In Health Problems with Vaccinated Children
The vaccinated group had a 4.5 times higher chance of having asthma. This increased risk of asthma was highly statistically significant. There was over a two times greater risk of ear infections and developmental delays. The study’s authors wanted to look for specific developmental delays such as autism. Due to the limitations of the data set, for example, these were medical clinics that cared for unvaccinated children. The data was not sufficient to draw any conclusions.
Inspired By CDC Whistleblower
This new study was inspired by a whistleblower from the CDC, who contacted Brian Hooker. At that point, Hooker had made somewhat of a name for himself in the anti-vaccine, or anti-vax, movement. The whistleblower, a CDC scientist named Dr. William Thompson, gave Hooker some new hints about where he should be focusing his research on vaccines. With these hints leading him in a new direction, Brian Hooker went about performing this study. The results don’t shed vaccines in a very positive light.
Things Don’t Look Good for Vaccines
On top of the revelations above, some aspects of the study indicate things might be even worse than they seem. For instance, the study primarily focused on three-year-olds who had been vaccinated; however, they included some five-year-olds as well. The five-year-olds appeared to show higher and more severe instances of the issues mentioned above than their three-year-old counterparts.
What this suggests is that issues caused at a young age by vaccines may not even show up until many, many years later. Further research is certainly going to be needed to figure out just how much damage vaccines truly cause infant children as they progress through life.
Stay Skeptical and Stay Safe!
Admittedly, this data should be fascinating to skeptics who aren’t sure where to stand on the whole “anti-vaccine” issue. While it’s hard to reach an utterly conclusive judgment based on the information we currently have, we can undoubtedly say that some of these health problems need to be examined further. Certainly, there’s more to the story than we know, and approaching the issue of vaccines and children with a healthy amount of skepticism seems like an absolute must going into the future. If you want to read more about this topic check out our other article on this subject, Vaccinated vs Un-vaccinated Kids: Who is Healthier?
When you think of meditation, your first thought might be of uber-spiritual people sitting for hours in silence. It’s amazing for reducing stress, relaxing the muscles, and increasing respiratory capacity. By slowing down the breath, the body moves out of fight or flight and into a state of rest and digest. However, because of this preconceived idea, many people think that meditation is unattainable.
What if I told you that the current vaccines for Covid-19 have likely killed over 25,000 Americans, would that number shock you? If it does, you need to read more about what you do not hear in the mainstream media.
According to a 
The vaccination datasets published by governments and health ministries worldwide were reported to have a relative risk reduction of 95% for Pfizer-BioNtech, 94% for the Moderna-NIH, 90% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the AstraZeneca-Oxford, and 67% for the Johnson and Johnson vaccines. Lancet Microbe has also pointed out that the absolute risk reductions in Pfizer, J&J, and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are as follows: 0.84% for Pfizer, 1.2% for J&J, and 1.2% for Moderna. 
